Follow us on Wechat

用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

Volume 11 Issue 5
Sep.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
P. Phillips, M. Escalona, P. Retamales, M. Ribeiro, F. Veloso, J. C. Valenzuela. 3D dynamics of a premagnetized gas-puff Z-pinch implosion[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2026, 11(5): 057402. doi: 10.1063/5.0327033
Citation: P. Phillips, M. Escalona, P. Retamales, M. Ribeiro, F. Veloso, J. C. Valenzuela. 3D dynamics of a premagnetized gas-puff Z-pinch implosion[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2026, 11(5): 057402. doi: 10.1063/5.0327033

3D dynamics of a premagnetized gas-puff Z-pinch implosion

doi: 10.1063/5.0327033
More Information
  • Corresponding author: a)Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed: pelayo.phillips@uc.cl and jcvalen1@uc.cl
  • Received Date: 2026-02-10
  • Accepted Date: 2026-06-08
  • Available Online: 2026-09-28
  • Publish Date: 2026-09-01
  • Gas-puff Z pinches are pulsed-power-driven plasma implosions used as compact laboratory sources of soft X rays and fusion neutrons and as a platform for magneto-inertial fusion research. When a pre-embedded axial magnetic field is applied, the implosion becomes intrinsically three-dimensional, with radial compression, self-generated rotation, and (in the presence of zippering) axial flow all contributing to the dynamics and to the energy balance of the pinch. Simultaneous resolution of all three velocity components is therefore essential for a complete description. We present the first simultaneous, spatially resolved measurement of all three velocity components (radial, azimuthal, and axial) in an annular magnetized argon gas-puff Z-pinch, performed using collective Thomson scattering along three orthogonal lines of sight from the same scattering volume at each time step. Measurements were carried out on the Llampüdkeñ pulse-power generator (400 kA peak, 200 ns rise time), for applied axial fields ranging from 0.04 to 0.26 T using two coil configurations: a double coil with negligible initial radial field at the probed plane (z = 8 mm) and a single coil that imposes a finite initial radial field. Three principal results are reported. First, the axial velocity component, which had not previously been measured experimentally in this configuration, reaches 60–70 km/s near the axis at low applied fields (Bz0 < 0.1 T) and is suppressed to within ±20 km/s for stronger applied fields, in correlation with the reduction of the zippering angle, with direct implications for the implosion energy balance. Second, the self-generated rotation extends across the full plasma diameter, not only at the periphery, and the diametrical profile of the azimuthal velocity decreases toward the axis nonlinearly, consistent with the underlying current density distribution; this feature was not visible in previous edge-localized measurements. Third, rotation persists in the double-coil case (Br0 ≈ 0) and is enhanced in the single-coil case (finite Br0), supporting the interpretation that Br develops self-consistently during the implosion and drives the rotation through a Jz × Br torque. These results constrain the role of each magnetic-field component and motivate direct measurement of Br and the current density distribution as the next step.
  • The authors have no conflicts to disclose.
    Conflict of Interest
    P. Phillips: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (lead); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Visualization (lead); Writing – original draft (lead). M. Escalona: Conceptualization (equal); Formal analysis (supporting); Funding acquisition (supporting); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Visualization (supporting); Writing – review & editing (lead). P. Retamales: Investigation (equal); Visualization (supporting). M. Ribeiro: Formal analysis (supporting); Writing – review & editing (supporting). F. Veloso: Funding acquisition (supporting); Resources (supporting); Supervision (supporting); Writing – review & editing (supporting). J. C. Valenzuela: Conceptualization (equal); Funding acquisition (lead); Investigation (supporting); Project administration (lead); Resources (lead); Supervision (lead); Writing – review & editing (lead).
    Author Contributions
    The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
  • loading
  • [1]
    J. Narkis, F. Conti, A. L. Velikovich, and F. N. Beg, “Mitigation of magneto-Rayleigh-Taylor instability growth in a triple-nozzle, neutron-producing gas-puff Z pinch,” Phys. Rev. E 104, L023201 (2021).10.1103/physreve.104.l023201
    [2]
    F. Conti, N. Aybar, J. Narkis, J. C. Valenzuela, H. U. Rahman et al., “Study of stability in a liner-on-target gas puff Z-pinch as a function of pre-embedded axial magnetic field,” Phys. Plasmas 27, 012702 (2020).10.1063/1.5131170
    [3]
    S. A. Slutz and R. A. Vesey, “High-gain magnetized inertial fusion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 025003 (2012).10.1103/physrevlett.108.025003
    [4]
    D. Klir, A. V. Shishlov, V. A. Kokshenev, P. Kubes, A. Y. Labetsky et al., “Efficient generation of fast neutrons by magnetized deuterons in an optimized deuterium gas-puff Z-pinch,” Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 57, 044005 (2015).10.1088/0741-3335/57/4/044005
    [5]
    C. A. Coverdale, C. Deeney, A. L. Velikovich, R. W. Clark, Y. K. Chong et al., “Neutron production and implosion characteristics of a deuterium gas-puff Z pinch,” Phys. Plasmas 14, 022706 (2007).10.1063/1.2446177
    [6]
    F. S. Felber, F. J. Wessel, N. C. Wild, H. U. Rahman, A. Fisher et al., “Gas–puff Z pinches with strong axial magnetic fields,” Laser Part. Beams 5, 699–706 (1987).10.1017/s0263034600003219
    [7]
    S. Chaikovsky, A. Y. Labetsky, V. Oreshkin, A. Shishlov, R. Baksht et al., “The K-shell radiation of a double gas puff Z-pinch with an axial magnetic field,” Laser Part. Beams 21, 255–264 (2003).10.1017/s0263034603212143
    [8]
    D. Mikitchuk, C. Stollberg, R. Doron, E. Kroupp, and Y. Maron et al., “Mitigation of instabilities in a Z-pinch plasma by a preembedded axial magnetic field,” IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 42, 2524–2525 (2014).10.1109/tps.2014.2327094
    [9]
    J. C. Valenzuela, I. Krasheninnikov, F. Conti, F. Wessel, V. Fadeev et al., “Injector design for liner-on-target gas-puff experiments,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 113509 (2017).10.1063/1.4997429
    [10]
    J. Shiloh, A. Fisher, and N. Rostoker, “Z pinch of a gas jet,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 515 (1978).10.1103/physrevlett.40.515
    [11]
    J. L. Giuliani and R. J. Commisso, “A review of the gas-puff Z-pinch as an x-ray and neutron source,” IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 43, 2385–2453 (2015).10.1109/tps.2015.2451157
    [12]
    T. J. Awe, C. A. Jennings, R. D. McBride, M. Cuneo, D. Lamppa et al., “Modified helix-like instability structure on imploding Z-pinch liners that are pre-imposed with a uniform axial magnetic field,” Phys. Plasmas 21, 056303 (2014).10.1063/1.4872331
    [13]
    J. M. Chen, G. V. Dowhan, B. J. Sporer, D. A. Yager-Elorriaga, N. M. Jordan et al., “Helical striations and magnetic flux compression in an axially premagnetized gas-puff Z-pinch imploding onto a dense central target,” IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 52, 4876 (2024).10.1109/TPS.2024.3435720
    [14]
    D. A. Yager-Elorriaga, P. Zhang, A. M. Steiner, N. M. Jordan, Y. Y. Lau et al., “Seeded and unseeded helical modes in magnetized, non-imploding cylindrical liner-plasmas,” Phys. Plasmas 23, 101205 (2016).10.1063/1.4965240
    [15]
    L. Atoyan, D. A. Hammer, B. R. Kusse, T. Byvank, A. D. Cahill et al., “Helical plasma striations in liners in the presence of an external axial magnetic field,” Phys. Plasmas 23, 022708 (2016).10.1063/1.4942787
    [16]
    D. A. Yager-Elorriaga, Y. Y. Lau, P. Zhang, P. C. Campbell, A. M. Steiner et al., “Evolution of sausage and helical modes in magnetized thin-foil cylindrical liners driven by a Z-pinch,” Phys. Plasmas 25, 056307 (2018).10.1063/1.5017849
    [17]
    M. Cvejić, D. Mikitchuk, E. Kroupp, R. Doron, P. Sharma et al., “Self-generated plasma rotation in a Z-pinch implosion with preembedded axial magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 015001 (2022).10.1103/physrevlett.128.015001
    [18]
    E. S. Lavine, A. Rososhek, J. Angel, E. Freeman, C. Chen et al., “Energetics of triple-nozzle gas-puff Z-pinch implosions on cobra,” IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 52, 4817–4832 (2024).10.1109/tps.2024.3379889
    [19]
    C. Deeney, P. D. LePell, F. L. Cochran, M. C. Coulter, K. G. Whitney et al., “Argon gas puff implosion experiments and two-dimensional modeling,” Phys. Fluids B 5, 992–1001 (1993).10.1063/1.860949
    [20]
    H. Chuaqui, E. Wyndham, C. Friedli, and M. Favre, “Llampüdkeñ: A high-current, low-impedance pulser employing an auxiliary exponential transmission line,” Laser Part. Beams 15, 241–248 (1997).10.1017/s0263034600010569
    [21]
    J. C. Valenzuela, M. Escalona, O. Loch, F. Veloso, and J. P. Díaz, “Comparison of round and knife-edge-like cathodes on gas-puff implosions,” Phys. Rev. E 108, 025202 (2023).10.1103/physreve.108.025202
    [22]
    C. E. Seyler, “Axial magnetic flux amplification in Hall-magnetohydrodynamic simulations of externally magnetized Z-pinches,” Phys. Plasmas 27, 092102 (2020).10.1063/5.0011833
    [23]
    D. Kumar and P. M. Bellan, “Nonequilibrium Alfvénic plasma jets associated with spheromak formation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 105003 (2009).10.1103/physrevlett.103.105003
    [24]
    D. H. Froula, S. H. Glenzer, N. C. Luhmann, and J. Sheffield, Plasma Scattering of Electromagnetic Radiation: Theory and Measurement Techniques, 2nd ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011).
    [25]
    M. Escalona, J. C. Valenzuela, G. Avaria, F. Veloso, and E. S. Wyndham, “Bayesian inference of plasma parameters from collective Thomson scattering technique on a gas-puff near stagnation,” Sci. Rep. 13, 13002 (2023).10.1038/s41598-023-40014-x
    [26]
    S. Ghazaryan, M. Kaloyan, and C. Niemann, “Silica Raman scattering probe for absolute calibration of Thomson scattering spectrometers,” J. Instrum. 16, P08045 (2021).10.1088/1748-0221/16/08/p08045
    [27]
    V. Valenzuela-Villaseca, L. G. Suttle, F. Suzuki-Vidal, J. W. D. Halliday et al., “Characterization of quasi-Keplerian, differentially rotating, free-boundary laboratory plasmas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 195101 (2023).10.1103/physrevlett.130.195101
    [28]
    D. D. Ryutov, M. S. Derzon, and M. K. Matzen, “The physics of fast Z pinches,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 167 (2000).10.1103/RevModPhys.72.167
    [29]
    M. Cvejić, T. Queller, E. Kroupp, D. Mikitchuk, R. Doron et al., “Spectroscopic method for measuring the radial component of the magnetic field in cylindrically imploding plasmas,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 97, 033508 (2026).10.1063/5.0301238
    [30]
    A. G. Rousskikh, A. S. Zhigalin, V. I. Oreshkin, and R. B. Baksht, “Measuring the compression velocity of a Z pinch in an axial magnetic field,” Phys. Plasmas 24, 063519 (2017).10.1063/1.4986096
    [31]
    D. Mikitchuk, M. Cvejić, R. Doron, E. Kroupp, C. Stollberg et al., “Effects of a preembedded axial magnetic field on the current distribution in a Z-pinch implosion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 045001 (2019).10.1103/physrevlett.122.045001
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(12)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (8) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return